Baqir al-Olum University Political Science 1735-0557 22 Issue 86 2019 08 23 Rational intellect in Iranshahri’s thought; comparing “Tanassor” to “Siyasatnameh” Rational intellect in Iranshahri’s thought; comparing “Tanassor” to “Siyasatnameh” 121 146 67723 10.22081/psq.2019.67723 FA Mohammad Taqi Qezelsofla Faculty of Mazandaran University Negin Nooryan University of Tehran Journal Article 2019 05 03 The aim of this study is to investigate and analyze the two ancient texts in the political thought of Iran, namely "Tanassor" and "Siaer Al Molk" in a sense of following a common pattern in the face of the struggles of his age as well as the concurrent frameworks of their political thought. In this regard, the research with descriptive - analytical method has investigated the continuity and survival of Iranshahri political thought, the pattern of Iranshari political thought in the history of Iranian civilization and how the original aspects are drawn into a model. The analysis of the qualitative content of these two works by using of Thomas Springs’s crisis theory showed that these two historical figures, in two different eras of the history of Iran, in recognition of the nature of the crisis, reasons of its causes, and the way out of it, acted similarly. Using the heritage of rational intellect and its elements like the superior status of the ideal ruler, the restoration of unity in multiplicity, preserve of moderation, wisdom and reason , justice, and the recognition of hierarchies and social cohesion, they have followed to exiting of the crisis of time. The aim of this study is to investigate and analyze the two ancient texts in the political thought of Iran, namely "Tanassor" and "Siaer Al Molk" in a sense of following a common pattern in the face of the struggles of his age as well as the concurrent frameworks of their political thought. In this regard, the research with descriptive - analytical method has investigated the continuity and survival of Iranshahri political thought, the pattern of Iranshari political thought in the history of Iranian civilization and how the original aspects are drawn into a model. The analysis of the qualitative content of these two works by using of Thomas Springs’s crisis theory showed that these two historical figures, in two different eras of the history of Iran, in recognition of the nature of the crisis, reasons of its causes, and the way out of it, acted similarly. Using the heritage of rational intellect and its elements like the superior status of the ideal ruler, the restoration of unity in multiplicity, preserve of moderation, wisdom and reason , justice, and the recognition of hierarchies and social cohesion, they have followed to exiting of the crisis of time. https://psq.bou.ac.ir/article_67723_f622964a77d7bb242d9299253e12adde.pdf