The present writing is to study the present and the future of the identity of Howzeh along with clericalism and its relationship with revolutionary Howzeh. Since the preserving and strengthening the collective identity of clericalism is considered an important issue and in need of surveillance and management, the preservation and advancement of the identity of clericalism is in need of re- identifying the obligation of Howzeh and clericalism in scale of social establishment of religion as well as the national and internationalpresence in this scale. The essence of revolutionary domain is nothing but accepting this responsibility. In this regard, the hypothesis of the present writing is that revolutionariness is considered as the main element for developing identity of Howzeh and clericalism and it is not a virtue beyond the main duty of seminary schools. Furthermore, revolutionariness is not merely the political cooperation of clericalism in government but also accepting the responsibility in social establishing of Islam.
Piroozmand, A. (2018). Revolutionariness, Identity Developer in Howzeh and Authority. Political Science, 20(Issue 80), 7-24. doi: 10.22081/psq.2018.65392
MLA
Alireza Piroozmand. "Revolutionariness, Identity Developer in Howzeh and Authority". Political Science, 20, Issue 80, 2018, 7-24. doi: 10.22081/psq.2018.65392
HARVARD
Piroozmand, A. (2018). 'Revolutionariness, Identity Developer in Howzeh and Authority', Political Science, 20(Issue 80), pp. 7-24. doi: 10.22081/psq.2018.65392
VANCOUVER
Piroozmand, A. Revolutionariness, Identity Developer in Howzeh and Authority. Political Science, 2018; 20(Issue 80): 7-24. doi: 10.22081/psq.2018.65392
)