The Impact of Political Approaches on the Development of Islamic and Shiite Studies in the British Academic Community

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Philosophy and Theology, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran

2 PhD, Shia Studies, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran

10.22081/psq.2024.68566.2869

Abstract

The British academic community has produced a plethora of studies encompassing various approaches to Islamic studies, ranging from foundational to practical or applied dimensions. This research aims to explore whether the British political system played a role in the initial development of these studies and, if so, whether it has exerted a distinct influence on Islamic initiatives. To address the first question, we employ the picture theory to examine the involvement of the British political system in Islamic studies. We assert that pictures—mental representations of reality—significantly influence decision-making and policymaking within political systems. By analyzing existing centers, articles, speeches, and other factors, alongside the mental images held by politicians, we conclude that Islamic and Shia studies in Britain are, to some extent, shaped by the perceptions and policies of the governing authorities and media. Drawing on the picture-making theory and its application to decision-making processes at both individual and organizational levels, we argue that these studies are partly constructed based on the prevailing images projected by governmental policies and media narratives, particularly through a critical lens of the governing policies regarding the Islamic world.

Keywords

References

  1. Astarabadi, A. (1989). Ta'wil al-Ayat al-Zahirah fi Fada'il al-Itrah al-Tahirah. Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute. [In Arabic]
  2. Bald, J., Harber, A., Robinson, N. & Schiff, E. (2010). Faith Schools, We Can Believe In, ensuring that Tolerant and Democratic Values are Upheld in Every Part of Britain's Education System. Policy Exchange. p. 30.
  3. Bright, M. (2006). When Progressives Treat with Reactionaries: The British State's flirtation with radical Islamism. Policy Exchange. p. 7.
  4. Castells, M. (2001). The Information Age: Power and Identity (H. Chavoshian, Trans.). Tehran: Tarh-e No. [In Persian]
  5. Chelonegar, M. A. (2011). Orientalism in a Sympathetic Manner: Methodology of Orientalists in Dealing with the Principles and Beliefs of Shi'ism. Surah Andisheh, (54-55), pp. 300-305. [In Persian]
  6. Cook, M. (2010). Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong in Islamic Thought. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Eftekhari, A. (2008). Two Faces of Islamophobia: Negative and Positive in Western Propaganda. Media, 20(3), pp. 29-43. [In Persian]
  8. Faramarz Qaramaleki, A. (2006). Methodology of Religious Studies. Mashhad: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences Publishing. [In Persian]
  9. Feel free to ask if you need any further refinement or additional sources!
  10. Gerholm, Y. T. & Lithman, G. (1988). The New Islamic presence in Western Europe. London: Mansell.
  11. Ghasemi, H., & Hatamzadeh, A. (2018). The Role of Think Tanks in Promoting Islamophobia in the UK, Case Study: Policy Exchange Think Tank. Political Studies of the Islamic World, (25), pp. 59-78. [In Persian]
  12. Ghazanfari, S., & Vahidi, S. (2015). The Succession of Imam Ali and the Event of Qadir: A Review and Critique of Robert Gleave's View. Shiite Studies, 1(3), pp. 75-95. [In Persian]
  13. Gleave, R. (2011). Ali b. Abi Talib. In: Encyclopedia of Islam (3 Ed.).
  14. Goodman, C. J. (2008). What is a think tank? Retrieved from: http://www.atlasusa.org/V2/files/pdfs/Chapter Goodman.pdf
  15. Group of Authors. (2009). Challenges of Shiite Studies by Western Scholars and Their Solutions. Qom: Khakriz. [In Persian]
  16. Ibn 'Uqda. (2003). Virtues of Amir al-Mu'minin. Qom: Dalile Ma. [In Arabic]
  17. Kohlberg, E. (1975) Some Imāmī-shīī Views on Taqiyya. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 95(3), p. 395.
  18. Kohlberg, E., Amir-Moezzi, M. A. (2009). Revelation and Falsification, The Kitāb al-qirā’āt of Ahmad b. Muhammad al-Sayyārī. Leiden: publisher Brill.
  19. Madelung, W. (1997). Succession to Muhammad, Rashidun Caliphate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Mills, T., Griffin, T. & Miller, D. (2011). The Cold War on British Muslims: An examination of Policy Exchange and the Centre for Social Cohesion. Spin watch Foundation. p. 40.
  21. Nasr, S. H. (2015). The Heart of Islam. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. [In Persian]
  22. Nazir-Ali, M. (28 Mar 2009). Controversial bishop quits Rochester diocese. The Guardian Newspaper.
  23. No'mani, M. (1983). al-Ghaybah (Fihri, Trans.). Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah. [In Arabic]
  24. Rich, A. (2004). Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Sane'pour, M. (2016). An Inquiry into Western Shiite Studies Methodology with a Focus on the Imamate of Ali. Nahj al-Balagha Studies, (49), pp. 63-84. [In Persian]
  26. Scharbrot, O. (2020). The Study of Shia Islam in British Academia: Some Preliminary Reflections. University of Birmingham: Department of Theology.
  27. Schimmel, A. M. (1997). Explaining the Verses of God: A Phenomenological Look at Islam. Qom: Office of Islamic Culture and Works Publishing. [In Persian]
  28. Scott-Baumann, A., Guest, M., Naguib, Sh., Cheruvallil-Contractor, S. & Phoenix, A. (2021). Islam on Campus: Contested Identities and the Cultures of Higher Education in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  29. Zaeri, Q., & Ragheb, A. (2014). Historical Methodology of Vico. Methodology of Humanities, (79), pp. 47-69. [In Persian]
Political Science
Volume 26, Issue 4 - Serial Number 104
November 2023
Pages 80-111

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics