Futures Studies on the Situational (Security-Defense) Status of Iran and Iraq in the West Asian Regional Security System (2025–2035)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Political Science (Iranian Politics), Ker.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Department of Political Science and International Relations, Ker.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the situational status and positioning of Iran
and Iraq within the West Asian regional security system over the coming decade. The significance and necessity of this research lie in enabling futures studies theorists and foreign policy analysts to gain a deeper, more nuanced understanding of the future security landscape in West Asia—and the specific roles of Iran and Iraq therein. Armed with these insights, they can develop comprehensive, structured strategies grounded in evidence-based foresight. This research adopts an applied futures studies approach, employing scenario planning as its method. It is qualitative in nature and follows a descriptive-analytical framework. The central question is: In what direction will the defense-security positioning of Iran and Iraq evolve within the West Asian regional situation over the next decade? It appears that the situational positioning of Iran and Iraq in the West Asian regional system will diverge significantly over the coming decade. This stems from their contrasting strategies and objectives within the regional arena. Using an adapted version of Peter Schwartz’s scenario planning methodology, we analyzed the defense-security situation of both countries over the next decade. Our analysis yielded the following key findings.
For Iran, two critical uncertainties emerge based on its interests, drivers, and influential factors in the regional security situation: (1) Central government duality and weakness (fragmentation, pressure, and sanctions); (2) Central government cohesion (alignment between diplomacy and the battlefield). These uncertainties generate two scenarios: (i) Fragmentation and collapse and (ii) attaining regional power and hegemony. For Iraq, two uncertainties were identified based on its influential components and drivers: (1) Central government authority (unity); (2) Central government weakness and disintegration (ethnic conflicts, etc.). The resulting scenarios are (i) Fragmentation; (ii) Federalism; (iii) Cohesive Iraq. The findings indicate that defense-security arrangements in West Asia over the next decade will follow four patterns: hegemonic stability, participatory governance, balance of power, and regional hegemony. Iran, leveraging its interests, capabilities, and regional standing, pursues its ultimate goal—eliminating regional and international rivals and achieving regional hegemony (Scenario 2)—through various strategies. Iraq, in contrast, seeks a participatory model and, to a lesser extent, balance of power, primarily through the Cohesive Iraq and Federalism scenarios.

Keywords


Ahmadian, M. (2024). Ham-afzāyī-yi kārburdī-yi bāzī-yi jang va āyandih-pazhūhī [Applied synergy between war games and futures studies]. Āyandih-pazhūhī-yi Difāʿī, 3(5),
pp. 181–205. [In Persian]
Aliyari, H., & Ranjbar, M. R. (2024). Rāhburd-hāyi Jumhūrī-yi Islāmī-yi Īrān dar majmūʿih-yi amniyyatī-yi khāvarmiyānih bā taʾkīd bar qudrat-i hūshmand (muṭāliʿih-yi mawridī-yi buḥrān-i ʿIrāq va Sūriya) [The Islamic Republic of Iran’s strategies in the Middle East security complex with emphasis on smart power (case study: Iraq and Syria crises)]. Buḥrān-pazhūhī-yi Jahān-i Islām, 3(34), pp.1–21. [In Persian]
al-Rawāshidī, ʿA. (2012). Al-ʿArab al-Sunnah fī al-ʿIrāq: Tārīkhuhum – wāqiʿuhum – mustaqbaluhum [Sunni Arabs in Iraq: Their history, reality, and future]. Riyadh: Maktab Majallat al-Bayān. [In Arabic]
al-Zubaydī, Ḥ. L., al-ʿIbādī, N. M., & al-Saʿdūn, ʿA. L. (2015). ʿIrāq dar justujū-yi āyandih [Iraq in search of a future] (A. Shams, Trans.). Tehran: Muʾassasih-yi Muṭāliʿāt-i Andīshih-sāzān-i Nūr. [In Persian]
Anderson, L. & Gareth S. (2014). The Future of Iraq: Dictatorship, Democracy or Division? Martin's Press.
Anderson, L., & Stansfield, G. (2004). The future of Iraq: Dictatorship, democracy, or division? Palgrave Macmillan.
Asadi, A., & Rastgoo, M. Z. (2019). Āyandih-yi niẓām-i siyāsī-yi ʿIrāq, pīshrān-hā va sināriyu-hāyi pīshrū [The future of Iraq’s political system: Drivers and prospective scenarios]. Muṭāliʿāt-i Siyāsī-yi Jahān-i Islām, 8(2), pp.149–170. [In Persian]
Buzan B. & Ole W. (2003). Regions And Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B. & Waver, D. (1998). Regions And Powers, The Structure of International Security. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, state and fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in The Past Cold War Era. London: Harvester; wheat sherf Publication.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era (2nd ed.). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
Cats, B. (2018). Axis Rising, Irans Evolving Regional Strategy and Non-State Partnerships in The Middle East. CSIS: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
Cats, B. (2018). Axis rising: Iran’s evolving regional strategy and non-state partnerships in the Middle East. Center for Strategic and International Studies. URL=
https://www.csis.org/analysis/axis-rising-irans-evolving-regional-strategy-and-non-state-partnerships-middle-east
Dacey, J. B. (2024). Beyond proxies: Iran’s deeper strategy in Syria and Lebanon. URL= https://ecfr.eu/publication/beyond-proxies-irans-deeper-strategy-insyriaandlebanon.
Dacey, J. B. (2024, Month Day). Beyond proxies: Iran’s deeper strategy in Syria and Lebanon. European Council on Foreign Relations. URL=          
https://ecfr.eu/publication/beyond-proxies-irans-deeper-strategy-in-syria-and-lebanon
Farhadi, F., & Mottaghi, A. (2024). ʿArabistān-i Saʿūdī va muʿammā-yi Īrān; sināriyu-yi muḥtamal dar ufuq-i 2030 [Saudi Arabia and the Iran puzzle: Likely scenario by 2030]. Pazhūhish-hāyi Rāhburdī-yi Siyāsat, 13(50), pp. 213–258. [In Persian]
Galbraith, P. (2013). The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War without End. M.z. Rastgoo and F. Ardizi. Tehran: The Center for Islamic Revolution Documents. [In Persian]
Ghaffari Hashjin, Z., & Nikoonahad, A. (2022). Sināriyu-hāyi naẓm-i manṭiqihʾī-yi khāvarmiyānih tā sāl-i 2030 bā taʾkīd bar kunishgarī-yi Īrān va ʿArabistān [Scenarios of the Middle East regional order until 2030 with emphasis on Iran and Saudi Arabia’s agency]. Muṭāliʿāt-i Ravābiṭ-i Bayn al-Milal, 15(1), pp.109–141. [In Persian]
Ijabi, A., Koulivand, Kh., & Mottaghi, H. (2023). Taḥlīl-i lāyih-lāyihʾī-yi ʿilal-i jang-hāyi āyandih-yi gharb-i Āsiyā [Layered causal analysis of future wars in West Asia]. Siyāsat-i Difāʿī, 32(125), pp.159–195. [In Persian]
Karimipour, D., & Raeiji, S. (2023). Īrān va manṭiqih-yi gharb-i Āsiyā; sināriyu-hāyi āyandih, bāzār-i farāvardih-hāyi naftī [Iran and West Asia: Future scenarios in the oil products market]. Āyandih-pazhūhī-yi Rāhburdī, 2(8), pp. 29–60. [In Persian]
Khezli, A., & Shahmohammadi, M. (2024). Sināriyu-hāyi āyandih-yi niẓām-I amniyyatī-yi manṭiqih-yi gharb-i Āsiyā dar ufuq-i 1405 [Future scenarios of the security order in West Asia by 2026]. Muṭāliʿāt-i Bunyādīn va Kārburdī-yi Jahān-i Islām, 6(19),
pp. 55-86. [In Persian]
Mirhosseini, F., & Eivazi, M. R. (2019). Sināriyu-hāyi āyandih-yi jāygāh-i zhiʾupulītīk-i Īrān dar niẓām-i qudrat-i manṭiqihʾī-yi gharb-i Āsiyā dar ufuq-i 1410 [Future scenarios of Iran’s geopolitical position in the West Asian regional power system by 2031]. Muṭāliʿāt-i Rāhburdī-yi Basīj, 22(83), pp. 143–169. [In Persian]
Mirzaei Kahagh, A. (2023). Taḥlīl-i tawsiʿih-yi jahānī-yi fanāvarī-hāyi murtabiṭ bā rīz parandih-hā dar yik dahih-yi ātī [Global development analysis of micro-aerial vehicle technologies in the next decade]. Āyandih-pizhūhī-yi Difāʿī, 8(28), pp. 33–55. [In Persian]
Mohammadi, Sh., Jafari Pabandi, S. F., & Khoshkhatti, M. (2023). Tartībāt-i amniyyatī-yi gharb-i Āsiyā va taʾthīr-i ān bar amniyyat-i Īrān az manẓar-i maktab-i Kūpinhāg [Security arrangements in West Asia and their impact on Iran’s security from the Copenhagen School perspective]. Siyāsat-i Mutʿāliyyih, 11(43), pp. 339–356. [In Persian]
Mousavi, S. M., & Ghasemi, F. (2024). Jang-hāyi shabakih-yī va bāzdārandigī; muṭāliʿih-yi mawridī-yi Jumhūrī-yi Islāmī-yi Īrān [Network-centric wars and deterrence: Case
study of the Islamic Republic of Iran]. Pazhūhish-hāyi Rāhburdī-yi Siyāsat, 13(5),
pp. 175–214. [In Persian]
Nourmohammadi, M., & Damirchi, ʿA. (2024). ʿAmalgarāʾī dar siyāsat-i khārijī-yi ʿIrāq (2005–2023); vīzhigī-hā va payāmad-hā [Pragmatism in Iraq’s foreign policy (2005–2023): Characteristics and implications]. Muṭāliʿāt-i Siyāsī-yi Jahān-i Islām, 13(3), pp. 45–73. [In Persian]
Salimi, J. (2021). Naqsh-i qudrat-hāyi manṭiqihʾī va farā-manṭiqihʾī dar mahār-i buḥrān-hāyi amniyyatī [The role of regional and extraregional powers in containing security crises]. Muḥīṭ-i Rāhburdī, 5(14), pp. 141–174. [In Persian]
Siraki, G. K. (2024). Naqsh-i inirzhī dar hamgarāʾī va amniyyat-i manṭiqih-yi gharb-i Āsiyā, bā taʾkīd bar ulgū-yi dūstī va dushmanī-yi Īrān va ʿIrāq dar ḥawzih-yi inirzhī [The role of energy in convergence and security in West Asia, emphasizing the Iran-Iraq friendship-enmity model in the energy domain]. Gharb-i Āsiyā, 2(1). [In Persian]
Slavin, B. (2023). Iran is still the main foreign power in Iraq.              
URL= https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/iran-is-still-the-main-foreign-power-in-iraq- 121476
Slavin, B. (2023, Month Day). Iran is still the main foreign power in Iraq. Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale. URL= https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/iran-is-still-the-main-foreign-power-in-iraq-121476
Tarazmpour, M. (2024). Āyandih-pizhūhī-yi ravābiṭ-i Īrān va ʿArabistān tā sāl-i 2028 [Futures studies on Iran-Saudi relations until 2028]. Muṭāliʿāt-i Bunyādīn va Kārburdī-yi Jahān-i Islām, 6(20), pp. 77–110. [In Persian]