DARPA and the Perpetuation of the Crisis Cycle in the Middle East

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD., Student, International Relations, Ha.C., Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.

2 Department of Political Science and International Relations, Ha.C., Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

10.22081/psq.2025.70538.2929

Abstract

Crisis and the Middle East (West Asia) have been two intertwined concepts in the 21st century. Understanding the persistence of the crisis cycle in the Middle East is a perennial concern for contemporary scholars. The presence of internal dynamics and the involvement of great powers in the Middle East have always constituted a significant part of the crisis process and cycle in the region. The United States has had the greatest presence in the Middle East since the second half of the 20th century. Alongside the direct presence of
the US government, various private economic, military, and other sectors have also
been actively present in the country's spheres of influence, contributing to and affecting many developments. The central question of this research is to what extent the arms manufacturing industry, as a private sector industry with the closest cooperation with the Pentagon, has been effective in creating crises in the Middle East. Specifically, how has DARPA, as one of the largest arms manufacturing companies in the United States, influenced US policy-making regarding the Middle East? The hypothesis suggests that DARPA, as the most advanced and largest collection of arms industries in the United States, through extraordinary innovations in the field of weaponry, seeks to steer US foreign policy towards fomenting war in the Middle East region in order to sell more military weapons and increase its power in the international arena. The article's hypothesis further posits that due to the existence of destabilizing factors such as religious, geopolitical, and sectarian conflicts, the motivation for various groups to purchase military equipment in this region is greater than in other regions; consequently, these industries can easily find a suitable market for selling their equipment. To examine this hypothesis, the theory of offensive realism is employed to analyze the alignment of US foreign policy with DARPA's interests and the creation of crises in the Middle East. The research finds that two elements—the existence of internal conditions (intra-regional conflicts) and the intervention of great powers—create a suitable market for arms-selling companies, enabling them to achieve their goals through lobbying within the US power structure and communication with active groups in the region. Reducing the intervention of entities like DARPA can only be achieved through fostering convergence, reducing conflicts, or establishing intra-regional security arrangements.

Keywords


Ahmadi Lafouraki, B. (2008). Lobbying in America. Abrar-e Moaser-e Tehran Publishing. [In Persian]
Ahmadi, H. (2009). Roots of the crisis in the Middle East. Kayhan Publications. [In Persian]
Buzan, B. (2004). The United States and the great powers: World politics in the twenty-first century. Polity Press.
Congress. (2017). Congress report of the Special Committee on Investigation of the Munitions Industry (Senate, 74th Congress, 2nd sess.).  
https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/nye.hm (Accessed April 15, 2016).
Cypher, J. (1991). Military spending after the Cold War. Journal of Economic Issues, 25(2),
pp. 607-615.
Fromkin, D. (2024). A peace to end all peace (H. Afshar, Trans.). Mahi Publishing. [In Persian]
Ghavam, A. (2014). International relations: Theories and approaches. SAMT Publications. [In Persian]
Glaser, C. L. (2010). Realism. In A. Collins (Ed.), Contemporary security studies (3rd ed.,
pp. 15-32). Oxford University Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2009). Reckless states and realism. International Relations, 23(2),
pp. 241-256.
Modarres, M., Khalili, R., & Atanejad, H. (2017). The role of military-industrial complexes in the foreign policy of the United States of America. International Relations Research Quarterly, no. 24. [In Persian]
Mohammadnia, M. (2017). Military-industrial complex: How it forms, internationalizes, and its consequences. Khorsandi Publications. [In Persian]
Morgenthau, H. J. (2005). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace
(H. Moshirzadeh, Trans.). Publications Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. [In Persian]
Morley Milton, A., & Peter Hinch, K. (2011). Crisis in the Middle East (S. Rastegar Shariat Panahi, Trans.). Ghomes Publishing. [In Persian]
Mottaghi, E., Baqaei, K., & Rahimi, M. (2010). An examination of US foreign policy in the Middle East after September 11 (based on the offensive realism approach). Political and International Research Quarterly, no. 4. [In Persian]
Reuters. (2016, September 7). Obama administration arms sales offers to Saudi top $115 billion. URL= https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-saudi-security-idUSKCN11D2JQ
Rezaei, M. (2004). Th e book of America (Special for conservatives in America). Abrar-e Moaser International Cultural Studies and Research Institute Publications. [In Persian]
Sadeghi, S. Sh., & Rahimi, A. (2015). Military-industrial complexes and US national security after September 11. Foreign Relations Quarterly, 28(4). [In Persian]
Shokouhi Azar, F., & Givaki, S. (2011). Military-industrial complexes and the role of militarism in US foreign policy. Political Science and International Relations, no. 16. [In Persian]
SIPRI. (2017). The SIPRI Top 100 arms-producing and military services companies, 2016. URL= https://www.sipri.org/publications/2017/sipri-fact-sheets/sipri-top-100-arms-producing-and-military-services-companies-2016
Taheri, A., & Naghusi, S. (2017). A review of US foreign policy in the Middle East with a view to the future. International Quarterly of Geopolitics, 13(48). [In Persian]
Waltz, K. (2018). Theory of international politics (A. Zamani, Trans.). Ney Publishing. [In Persian]