Technology Policymaking and Regional Crises in the Third Decade of the Twenty-First Century

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Professor, Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Regional crises remain a central concern for scholars and practitioners in the fields of international relations and regional studies. The significance of the issue lies in the potential for such crises to reverberate beyond local borders, influencing both the affected region and the broader international system. Depending on the regional context and underlying causes, these crises can take on various forms. This study aims to offer a clear understanding of regional crises in the third decade of the twenty-first century. I argue that this decade—marked by the transition from a networked society to one driven by artificial intelligence, shaped by technological transformations—has created fertile ground for long-term, high-intensity, and unpredictable crises, particularly in volatile regions. The study takes note of the fact that the third decade of this century is distinguished from the bipolar era in terms of identity-based, structural, and geopolitical crises, many of which are rooted in global technological developments. These shifts can be analyzed within the framework of “strategic geoeconomics,” referring to the interconnection between industrial tools, regional security strategies, new technologies, and artificial intelligence. Communication technologies and information tools are now critical factors in shaping the balance of power and the political survival of key actors. At the heart of this process is the technology policymaking of global powers and regional players. In the third wave of the technological revolution, technologies have become increasingly replicable and diffuse, posing major challenges for great powers. The core of this challenge lies in the changing balance of power, the rise of identity-driven groups, and the escalation of regional crises. The central question of this article is: What are the defining features of technology policymaking, and how has it shaped regional crises in the third decade of the twenty-first century? The article’s main hypothesis is that twenty-first-century technology policymaking is concerned with the shift from a network society to an AI-driven order, giving rise to escalating crises and chaotic regions. This is because any transformation in technological configurations has triggered shifts in power balance, the formation of resistance identities, and the emergence of a reconfigured global order. The main cause of this process can be traced to concepts such as changing power dynamics, rise of identity groups, and escalating regional crises such as Israel’s wars in Gaza and Lebanon. Each of these factors can be viewed as part of the security strategies of both regional players and global powers, manifesting in different forms across various regions—including Southwest Asia. The geoeconomics of power in this region is deeply complex and interwoven, making it difficult to understand and making any relevant action contingent upon multiple interrelated factors. The Gaza crisis, in particular, stands out as one of the most critical security challenges of the twenty-first century, fundamentally shaped by strategic geoeconomic imperatives that have disrupted prior regional and global assumptions.

Keywords


Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.
Barrett, W. (2025). China's Economic Ascendance: A Journey through China's Economic Transformation. Barrett Williams Press.
Dittmar, J.E. (2011). Information Technology and Economic Change: The Impact of the Printing Press. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), pp.72-113.
Eisenstein, E.L. (1979). The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. London: Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson, N.  (2019). The Square and the Tower: Networks, Hierarchies and the Struggle for Global Power. London: Penguin Books.
Ford, H., Dubois, E. & Puschmann, C. (2016). Keeping Ottawa Honest, One Tweet at a Time? Politicians, Journalists, Wikipedians and their Twitter Bots. International Journal of Communication, vol.10, pp.4891–4914.
Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy, understanding the international economic order. Princeton University Press.
Guldi, J. (2012). Roads to Power: Britain Invents the Infrastructure State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Vol. 1; T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.
Herz, J.H. (1981). Political Realism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly, 25(2), pp.182–197.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (2007). Globalization, Democracy and Terrorism. London: Little Brown.
Hruschka, J. (2012). How Books Came to America: The Rise of the American Book Trade. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Khamenei, S. A. (2024, August 27). Nekhostin didar-e hey’at-e dowlat-e chahardahom ba rahbar-e enghelab [First meeting of the fourteenth government’s cabinet with the Leader of the Revolution]. Retrieved from: https://farsi.khamenei.ir/news-content?id=57420. [In Persian]
Larijani, A. (2024). Aql va sokoun dar hokmrani [Reason and tranquility in governance]. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
Lasch, C. (1979). The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: W.W. Norton.
Loendorf, W. (2010). The Social, Economic, And Political Impact Of Technology: An Historical Perspective. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—16269.
López , P. G. (2024). Foucault and Digital Technologies of Power Studying resistance as decentralization. URL= https://openaccess.uoc.edu/bitstream /10609/151013/1/pgarcialFMDP0624report.pdf
Mann, M. (2005). The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLuhan H. M. (1952). Technology and Political Change, International Journal, 7(3) (Summer, 1952), pp. 189-195.
McLuhan, M. (1969). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man”, Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Pierre. Ch., Edward, L. & Milner, H. (2024). International Cooperation in International Relations. URL= https://hal.science/hal-04601330v1/document
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, R.D. (2007). E pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty‐first Century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), pp.137–174.
Singer, P. & Friedman, A. (2014). Cyber security: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singer, p. (2002). One World: Ethics of Globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Streitfeld, D. (2017). The Internet Is Broken: @eve is Trying to Salvage It. The New York Times. URL= available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/20/ technology/evan-williams-medium-twitter-internet.html 
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects us and Undermines Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.