عنوان مقاله [English]
The study of scholars’ view- pros and cons- concerning the constitutionalism and the concepts related to it would be considered the main issue of the present article. Taking advantage of the instruction of “Discrepancy in Beliefs”, the author has endeavored to clarify the quiddity of discrepancy among the scholars of constitutionalism period. In this writing, it has been considered the divergence among the scholars towards the concept of constitutionalism and the issues around it such as law, freedom, and justice. According to the article, difference in taking position of the scholars in this period, before everything, refers to their different views towards constitutionalism and the concepts connected to that. Without regarding their incongruity in beliefs, it is not possible to analyze their different positions in regard with constitutionalism.