نقش کارویژه‌های تبدیل و استحاله در سقوط نظام پهلوی

Transformation and transmutation functions can serve as criteria and a framework for assessing the effectiveness of political systems. These functions can provide reliable indicators for examining successful transitions in political development. Conversely, examining the extent to which these functions are fulfilled can also help explain why a political system deteriorates and ultimately collapses. This constitutes the objective of the present article. Accordingly, the study adopts Almond and Powell’s transformation and transmutation functions to propose a new approach to explaining the collapse of the Pahlavi regime, particularly given that the Pahlavi regime itself claimed to be pursuing the modernization and development of Iran. Yet, rather than bringing the process of development to fruition, it ultimately experienced collapse. This study can therefore shed light on the reasons for the political development impasse under the Pahlavi political system. Numerous studies have examined the causes and mechanisms underlying the fall of the Pahlavi regime; however, this article seeks to explain this historical development from a different perspective. The present study addresses the following question: What relationship existed between the transformation and transmutation function and the fall of the Pahlavi regime? More precisely, was the regime’s inability to fulfill the components of the transformation and transmutation function the principal cause of its collapse? To answer this question, the study hypothesizes that the Pahlavi regime collapsed because it was unable to translate the inputs of the political system—including the articulation and aggregation of interests—into outputs, namely, the formulation and implementation of laws and the judicial functioning of the system. In other words, according to this hypothesis, under the Pahlavi regime, political inputs were effectively 
prevented from entering the power structure because of the suppression of political freedoms, the prohibition of genuine political parties, and the absence of meaningful popular participation. Consequently, the collapse of the regime became inevitable. This study adopts the theoretical framework of Almond and Powell’s theory, through which political development is examined from a functionalist perspective. In the midst of the
Cold War, these two scholars sought to clarify the requirements for achieving political development in developing countries. Given the limitations of the study, among the three sets of political-system functions identified by these scholars—namely, transformation and transmutation functions, adaptation functions, and the functional capabilities of the political system—this article focuses on the first and uses it as a framework for explaining the fall of the Pahlavi regime. Methodologically, the article is also based on a causal approach. A causal mechanism refers to a sequence of events and variables through which at least two or more variables are linked to one another. In this study, the fall of the Pahlavi regime is the dependent variable, while the six transformation and transmutation functions constitute the independent variables. Transformation and transmutation encompass several functions. More specifically, interest articulation, interest aggregation, rule-making or legislation, rule application by the executive branch, judicial performance, and political communication are components that, taken together, reflect the level of effectiveness of a political system; their inadequate performance can ultimately lead to the collapse of a political system. Data
for this study were collected through library-based research. The findings indicate
that although the Pahlavi regime ostensibly pursued a modernization project, it was fundamentally deficient in the transformation and transmutation function, because it neither permitted the free articulation of interests nor formulated laws in accordance with public demands. In effect, what persisted was a traditional and authoritarian political system that had merely adopted a developmentalist façade. This reality can provide important lessons for the analysis of contemporary political systems and the diagnosis of obstacles to development, offering valuable insights to researchers and policymakers. For example, achieving sustainable development requires realizing the transformation and transmutation function through the institutionalization of political participation, the rule of law, and government accountability to the will of the people. This challenge extends beyond the Cold War era and remains a major concern for many political systems today. According to this study, this functional gap gradually eroded the social base of the Pahlavi regime and, at the critical juncture of the 1979 Revolution, led to the regime’s collapse, given the absence of any legal capacity for converting protests into peaceful political change.